More Pages: Northeast Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95


a book with many misunderstandings
Excellent Work
An Excellent General History of the Ainu People, 9/17/2000The author aptly presents Ainu historical and cultural experiences. The impact of laws by the various ruling societies on this subjugated; indigenous minority is addressed, as is the influence that the Ainu people have on their various masters. The author successfully shows that ".... the Ainu not as an isolated primitive people without a history, but a people who were a wider part of a wider history in Northeast Asia. The history of the Ainu is intertwined with the history of the Japan, the Mongol and Manchu Empire in China, and the Russian and Soviet Empire in Siberia."
The author 's efforts to make unfamiliar Ainu and Japanese words and terminology understandable are invaluable. The book's bibliography, glossary of Ainu words, chronology of events, maps, charts and illustrations are also valuable aids to understanding the Ainu history.
The reader will find this book of Ainu history to be an interesting and authoritative work that scholar and enthusiast alike can appreciate.


why are you using my name
definitive!
Outstanding resourceWell worth reading for anyone who loves the Northeast coastline - whether or not they have ever entered an unfamiliar harbor, short of food and fuel, just ahead of a storm.


A Waste of PaperIf you were expecting anything that resembles a travel book, such as Lonley Planet or Fodor's, which helps you decide what to do, not just list the names and addresses of attractions, keep looking (I know I still am).
Great Book for People of All Ages
Great For Grandparents On The Go

Inaccurate and MisinformedTherefore, many of the "British-related sites" she highlights throughout her book are dubious. For example, she recommends dozens of Irish pubs throughout the U.S. as genuine "Anglophile" outposts: "The owners are from Killarney," she writes of one pub. Yet again, does she realize that Killarney is in Ireland, NOT the UK?! The Union Jack does not fly over Killarney, Ireland, which directly conflicts with the book's cover art, which displays a Union Jack and is meant to give the impression that the book is about UK sites in the USA.
It's not simply what's in the book that's erroneous, it's what Rudisill has left out. In guiding readers through New York's Central Park, she completely omitted Strawberry Fields, the tribute to John Lennon--a Liverpool, UK native, and one of the most prolific songwriters and musicians of our time. How could she possibly have missed that must-see?
Much of the text is also repetitive; an introductory paragraph to places of interest is repeated throughout the book. That doesn't make for very original or engaging writing.
I returned my book. Any Anglophile with an ounce of sense (e.g., the difference between the UK and Ireland) and access to the internet can devise a far more genuine itinerary of British points of interest in the USA.
THIS BOOK IS AWESOME!!!
Blokes, start your engines!

not so thoroughly researched
Everything You Need To Know- I Already Knew...
A Monument to Love in a Few Hundred Pages

No Cross Streets
Excellent to have - looking for 1999's guide
Great Map!!

Cool writing, hard to use
I've lost that 'local' feelingWhile it's refreshing to read both pros and frank cons of various venues, I felt the Frommer's Irreverent content wasn't as broad as I'd expect from guides built up over several years: my favorite sushi joint, Jae's Cafe, was mentioned six times in 20 pages as a great spot for Terminally Hip, Vegging Out, Global Harmony, Same-Sex, Thai, and After-Hours dining experiences. Additionally, I felt it lacked the benefit of a local editor (the John Hancock tower is referenced not as being on the well-known Clarendon Street, but rather on a fictitious Claridence Street).
I would heartily recommended the Irreverent Guide as a complement to another book to give any recommended itinerary a reality-check, but I wouldn't exclusively depend on this guide to plan a multi-day visit.
great restaurants and bars

2002-2003 edition still includes World Trade Center!!
this is awful
Most comprehensive

Improbable, not compelling, a disappointment
The Northeast Kingdomthat this book was actually written by Chuck Hogan. When I read this book I thought it was actually written by a woman.
Check out page 54 (paperback) "Rebecca noted that the sage-green floral wallpaper matched the fabric of the seat cushions, and the lien". Or page 57 "sitting in a quilt-backed rocking chair with a china cup of blackberry tea...." Does that sound like a male writer or does it sound like one of those cozy British mysteries.
Fast paced action

Watch out for outdated information.
Too many scattered listings, not enough informationBut because they cover *all* the New England states, each section is necessarily full of capsule information, and no useful maps. (the state map of MA, for example, doesn't even show some of the towns mentioned in the text, or show where sites are located in relation to each other) It's basically a useful list with phone numbers, addresses and hours. The authors assume that the reader will have maps available, since written directions are nonexistent. So, I'm not sure if this a travel guide for native New Englanders, or visitors. Either way, it's damned inconvenient.
It did surprise me with some of the selections - like Harvard's Museum of Culture and Natural History and Myopia Polo; but coming from Boston myself, I noticed there wasn't a heck of a lot "new" in the MA section. In all fairness, it's hard to come up with new kid friendly sites in Boston. Most guidebooks cover that territory exhaustively. Restaurants are featured in each section (excellent idea) but no listing tells you how near the eateries are located to sites. Do you need to make special trips to eat out?
Another quibble I've got is that many of the sites chosen assume that readers are families with older children. However, it is angled for families going on weekends or vacations together, so I can't complain too much about the limited number of listings for those with toddlers in tow.
I sound pretty negative. I bought this book expecting to find lots more listings relevant to my needs (at this time), and am only partially satisfied. However, the authors have done their homework. You can tell that they visited the sites they mention, and that's no small thing. What they do say about the places they visited has a ring of authenticity, and I feel I can trust their word. It's hard work researching (esp with children in tow)...now if only they could fix up the flaws.
great ideas for places to take kids that you wouldn't expect